OK – well day one seemed to go well, although I may have
terrified more than inspired. Increasingly I want students to know up front
what a project-based course means. This
has gone beyond the rap about participating and no place to hide in the
classroom to include a bit about how the course will be graded. I find the
whole “no child left” thing instilled a desire, no, a need, to be graded and
testes seemingly all the time. Not for all students, but some really need to
periodic kick of a grade. Far too carrot and stick for me, so I explain a bit
about the type of feedback they will receive. I simply can’t place a letter or
numerical grade on the projects – you either execute the project or you don’t.
So – after the long, long chat about the syllabus and grading and the content
of the course and so on we got up on our feet and, well – the standard – name,
what you study and something interesting about yourself. I must say – some interesting
things to remember people by. After we played a brief word game in which
students draw an unusual word out of a glass and then come up with a definition
for it. This was somewhat successful – but the failing was not to have a
separate word for each student. Only about ½ -2/3rds volunteered to join the
game. The next class we will do something that will involve everyone. Looking forward
to chatting about the Futurists on Thursday.
No comments:
Post a Comment